Threads, argued out.
Point at a discussion thread, get a podcast episode. Not a read-aloud: a debate between the positions people in the thread actually held, each with the airtime it actually had.
Listen now
RedditNewest, in English 路 9 min 路 11 October 2026
The Ultimate Cinematic Sacrifice: Rules vs. Emotion
What truly defines a heroic sacrifice in film? A Reddit thread on the movies subreddit debated whether strict rules about survival and permanent death matter more than a moment's emotional impact, with many arguing for the power of feeling over technicalities.
Details
- The Emotional Resonance Advocate
- The Rule-Bound Realist
- The Underdog Risen to the Occasion
- The Grand Scale Heroics
The host speaks 33% of the episode.
Just shared
Make your own.
Paste a link and you get an episode. Anything you choose to share joins the public feeds; anything you do not stays yours alone. Your own feed carries both — what you made and what you follow, in one subscription.
Sloppod lets in one new person a day while it is small. There is a list.
Sign in, or ask for an account
Or send the page you are reading, from the tab you are reading it in: Sloppod for Chrome.
How an episode gets made
A thread with four hundred comments has maybe five arguments in it, held with wildly different amounts of support. Sloppod finds those clusters, gives each one a speaker, and weights their airtime by how much of the room actually stood behind them. A thread that went ninety-ten produces an episode that sounds ninety-ten.
- You paste a link. A Reddit thread, a Hacker News item, a Lemmy or Mastodon post, a Lobsters story, a Discourse forum topic, a public Facebook post, or an article. Anything in it that is a picture is transcribed, not described.
- The thread is weighed. A model reads the whole discussion, finds the positions, and gives each one a persona with its real weight attached. They argue, and a referee checks the airtime against the weights while the model is still on the line.
- It lands in your podcast app. Voices, a mix that is measured rather than predicted, and it lands in your podcast app — and, unless you say otherwise, in the feeds for its source and its topic.
What it refuses to do
- Describe what it cannot see. Images, video and PDFs in a thread arrive as links that nothing fetches. The page a thread is about is the exception: when a Hacker News or Reddit post links to an article, the article is read, and the host sums it up in their own words with one short quote at most — or says plainly that it could not be read. A screenshot of writing is transcribed, because that genuinely closes the gap and the words are quotable. A photograph is not described, because a description is an interpretation, and it would land in the source material as the fact five personas then argue from.
- Fill the time. Running short is never the fault. The only way to fill a budget on a thread that has run out of disagreement is to invent one, so the script stops when the argument does.
- Report a vote that the platform does not have. Reddit has up and down. Instagram has likes and no way at all to push a comment down. Hacker News publishes no per-comment score. Each source declares which of those it is, and a count is left absent rather than reported as zero, because a zero is a lie in the shape of a measurement.
- Name anybody. Comment authors reach the model as u1, u2, u3. A persona can never be a named account. Nothing that was not posted publicly is ingested at all.
- Put a private person in a public feed without being asked. A thread arguing about somebody's own situation rather than about a policy or a product comes out private whatever the form said, because nothing can tell until the thread has been read. The person who made it can share it afterwards, if they judge it fair. The same goes for an episode built from a single article.